Fathers 4 Justice South Africa

Book a consultation

Welcome to Fathers 4 Justice South Africa

Fathers protecting their children

Why Fathers Are Negatively Impacted in Paying Maintenance in South Africa

Under South African law children have the right to receive financial maintenance. Both parents are required to provide financial support for a child. Maintenance amounts are not arbitrary. They must be negotiated and finalized according to the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998 and the Children’s Act 38 of 2005.
Fathers 4 Justice South Africa asserts that, in accordance with the Children’s Act, both parents have a financial, legal, moral, and societal responsibility to pay maintenance for their child, within their means or earning capacity. This is undisputed.
Fathers 4 Justice South Africa acknowledges that “deadbeat dads” exist, but equally recognizes that there are also “deadbeat mothers.” This is not in dispute.
However, Fathers 4 Justice South Africa contends that the South African maintenance system is deliberately misused to financially and legally devastate fathers through a biased, woke, misandrist, gynocentric, justice framework. Maintenance is purposefully used as a weapon of mass destruction by mothers, their lawyers, and the courts to legally and financially destroy fathers, with the direct and malicious intent to remove fathers from their children’s lives intentionally. This claim is firmly asserted.

Ergo,

In South Africa, the burden of child maintenance falls heavily on fathers, who are often legally required to contribute financially to their children’s well-being. However, numerous social, economic, and legal barriers make it increasingly difficult for fathers to meet these obligations, placing them in a precarious position. The country’s high unemployment rate, which stood at 32.6% in 2024, (South Africa currently as of July 2024 +/- 32% of the employable workforce are unemployed, and an additional +/- 30% have given up looking for work. South Africa is sitting with more than 60% of its workforce in South Africa unemployed which has a direct negative impact on fathers being able to pay maintenance.) coupled with pervasive poverty, makes regular child maintenance payments an insurmountable challenge for many fathers (Statistics South Africa, 2024). Fathers who lose their jobs or struggle with low wages often find themselves unable to make regular payments, leading to legal penalties, strained relationships with their children, and mental health problems.

Historically, the legacy of apartheid and the migrant labor system has disrupted family structures, particularly among Black South African men. These men were often separated from their families, and this cultural norm of absentee fatherhood persists today. According to the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), nearly 50% of children in South Africa live without their fathers (South African Institute of Race Relations, 2018). This absence can lead to financial and emotional disconnection, with fathers struggling to stay involved due to geographic and economic constraints. In addition, social norms that define men primarily as financial providers, rather than emotional caregivers, exacerbate these issues. Fathers who face financial hardship may feel ashamed and marginalized, leading to a cycle of disengagement from their children’s lives.

Economic challenges are compounded by South Africa’s deeply unequal society. Fathers from disadvantaged racial and socio-economic backgrounds, particularly Black fathers, are less likely to have access to stable employment, housing, and financial resources (Stats SA, 2019). The unequal access to resources not only limits these fathers’ ability to pay child maintenance but also entrenches broader economic disparities. These fathers are disproportionately affected by the collapse of key industries and the country’s political instability, which has led to widespread corruption and inefficiency in government services.

Beyond economic struggles, South Africa’s legal system also plays a role in deliberately perpetuating the difficulties fathers face in paying child maintenance. The Department of Social Development issued the Children’s Amendment Bill [B18-2020] in response to gaps in the Children’s Act, yet many legal experts argue that the system is slow to respond to fathers’ needs.
The Department of Social Development (DSD) was overwhelmed by fathers across the country demanding vital changes to the Children’s Act. As of the writing of this article, the DSD has failed to make those changes.
Fathers can face years of legal battles just to secure inadequate contact with their children, and the legal fees associated with these protracted cases only deepen their financial strain. Furthermore, the stigma around non-custodial fathers, often exacerbated by a “deadbeat dad” narrative, means that many men feel alienated from both their children and the legal system. (Between 6% and 7% of fathers in any given population or geographical group can be truly categorized as a deadbeat father)

Culturally, South African men are also constrained by traditional gender roles. In many communities, men are expected to be the sole financial providers, which places immense pressure on them to meet child maintenance obligations, regardless of their financial circumstances. Even when fathers are unemployed or underemployed, they are still seen as financially responsible, further driving the cycle of debt, legal consequences, and emotional detachment.

Additional reading – How Contact with Children Increases Post-Divorce Fathers’ Child Maintenance Compliance

This complex web of social, economic, and legal factors makes paying child maintenance in South Africa a significant challenge for many fathers. With inadequate support systems in place, many men find themselves overwhelmed by the financial demands, leading to legal penalties and damaged familial relationships. For South Africa to address these issues, systemic reform is necessary to ensure that fathers are not only able to meet their financial obligations but also supported in maintaining emotional and physical relationships with their children.

The Department of Social Development’s Delays in Revising the Children’s Act: Perpetuating the Abuse of Fathers and Children

The deliberate delays in revising the Children’s Act have led to a growing outcry among fathers in South Africa, as the Department of Social Development continues to fail in implementing much-needed reforms. In 2019, the Department issued the CHILDREN’S AMENDMENT BILL [B18-2020] S76, which was supposed to address critical gaps in the Children’s Act. These reforms, proposed after extensive public hearings and consultations, included addressing the legal and financial hardships faced by fathers during divorce and custody battles. Fathers across the country raised their concerns, particularly highlighting the legal, emotional, psychological, and financial toll these battles inflict on them and their children. However, despite the urgency and clear demand for reform, the Department has yet to act, effectively sweeping these critical issues under the rug. This failure is not just a matter of bureaucratic inefficiency but a perpetuation of systemic abuse, as it continues to exacerbate the challenges faced by fathers who are already marginalized in the family law system.

The Department of Social Development’s inaction has had severe consequences, particularly in cases involving divorce and child custody. By refusing to implement the necessary changes, the Department has enabled the continued exploitation of fathers, many of whom are subjected to legal and financial abuse through protracted court battles. Fathers often find themselves trapped in a legal system that is biased against them, where mothers are more likely to be granted primary custody (in 91% Of the cases according to the responding affidavit by The Family Advocates office in the Von Ginkel Louw Case at the equality court circa 2010 and in 92% of the cases as advised By the previous minister Lindiwe Zulu of the Department of Social Development at the youth day celebrations in 2022), leaving fathers with limited access to their children and exorbitant financial maintenance obligations. This blatant gender bias has created an environment where fathers are not only denied equal treatment but are also viciously financially crippled by the legal process. The refusal to address these issues in the Children’s Amendment Bill represents a clear disregard for the rights of fathers, as the Department continues to favor mothers in custody cases, reinforcing harmful stereotypes that cast fathers as less capable or less important caregivers.

The social impacts of this inaction are profound. Fathers who are denied fair treatment in custody battles often experience significant emotional and psychological distress. The stigma attached to being a non-custodial father, combined with the stress of navigating an adversarial legal system, can lead to mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, and feelings of helplessness. Many fathers also report experiencing alienation from their children, as the prolonged legal battles and biased rulings often result in limited contact with their kids. This emotional strain not only affects the fathers but also has long-term consequences for their children. Research consistently shows that children benefit from having active and involved fathers in their lives. When fathers are unfairly marginalized, children lose out on the emotional and developmental support that a father can provide, exacerbating the cycle of emotional neglect and instability.

Moreover, the Department of Social Development’s failure to address these issues also contributes to the perpetuation of financial abuse against fathers. The current legal framework places a disproportionate financial burden on fathers, who are often required to pay maintenance without considering their ability to contribute equally to the upbringing of their children through shared custody. This financial strain is compounded by a collapsed economic system in South Africa, where unemployment rates are high, and many fathers struggle to meet their maintenance obligations. Instead of implementing reforms that would provide a more balanced approach to child support and custody arrangements, the Department continues to perpetuate a system that financially cripples fathers, forcing many into debt and poverty. Fathers have repeatedly called for reforms that take into account their financial and emotional involvement in their children’s lives, but these pleas have largely been ignored.

The Department of Social Development’s deliberate delays in revising the Children’s Act reflect a systemic disregard for the needs of fathers and a failure to protect the best interests of the children involved. By refusing to address the gender bias in family law and custody arrangements, the Department is exacerbating the abuse of children during divorce and custody battles. Children are caught in the crossfire of these legal disputes, often suffering from emotional trauma as they are used as pawns in a system that prioritizes financial support over emotional involvement. Fathers across the country are calling for the Department to act, to implement the necessary reforms that would create a more balanced and fair legal framework for both parents. Until these changes are made, the Department’s inaction will continue to harm both fathers and their children, perpetuating a cycle of emotional, psychological, legal, and financial abuse that could have been avoided had the necessary reforms been implemented in a timely manner.

Additional reading – FAQ on Financial and Maintenance Abuse Faced by Fathers in South Africa

The Economic and Financial Abuse Fathers Face in the South African Maintenance System

In South Africa, fathers are increasingly facing financial abuse through maintenance orders that are not based on their financial reality. This issue is exacerbated by a dysfunctional economic system, where approximately 60% of employable-age individuals are out of work, adding immense pressure on fathers who are legally obligated to pay maintenance for their children. While it is crucial to affirm that fathers have both a legal and moral responsibility to provide financial support for their children, the way maintenance orders are derived and enforced often leads to economic abuse, a concept recognized under South African law. In fact, the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 and its Amendment Act 14 of 2021 both acknowledge economic abuse, including coercive and controlling behavior that leads to financial subjugation. Unfortunately, fathers are too often victimized by this form of abuse during divorce or separation proceedings.

The legal system tends to overlook the financial capabilities of fathers when determining maintenance amounts. Maintenance orders frequently require fathers to pay amounts that are exorbitant and, in many cases, exceed their monthly income. Lawyers representing fathers in these cases often fail to protect their clients from agreeing to unsustainable amounts. Fathers are coerced, bullied, and manipulated into agreeing to such maintenance terms, especially in situations where they fear losing or in the vast majority of cases already lost access to their children. This coercion is a clear form of financial abuse, as it forces fathers to commit to payments they are not capable of maintaining in the long run. The Domestic Violence Amendment Act of 2021 recognizes such behavior as a form of coercive control, aiming to make a person subservient through financial manipulation and intimidation (Derebus.org.za).

It is also evident that the legal process itself is complicit in this abuse. Too often, courts dismiss or outright refuse to consider evidence that demonstrates a father’s inability to meet the demanded maintenance payments. In several cases, courts have blamed fathers for their financial shortcomings, even though the amounts they are expected to pay are unreasonable from the start. Fathers are then chastised for not providing evidence, even when the courts have failed to allow the proper presentation of such evidence during hearings.

As a result, fathers are frequently driven into financial ruin. They are financially abused by a legal system that should protect their rights and ensure fair treatment but instead perpetuates an abusive cycle. This financial strain has a deep psychological and emotional impact on fathers, many of whom feel trapped in an unjust system that punishes them for their financial realities. As reported on DivorceLaws.co.za, economic abuse is a devastating form of control, particularly when fathers are denied access to their children unless they meet impossible financial demands. This pattern of abuse, manipulation, and intimidation is all too common in South Africa’s maintenance system.

Additionally, the process often exacerbates tensions between parents, making it harder to establish a healthy co-parenting relationship. Fathers who are financially abused often feel resentment and hopelessness, which can affect their relationship with their children. The Domestic Violence Amendment Act recognizes that economic abuse involves depriving someone of financial resources they need for survival or are entitled to, but this protection is not extended to fathers in maintenance disputes. Instead, fathers are left to bear the brunt of an abusive legal process that further isolates them from their children and their financial stability.

The issue of financial abuse is not just about unreasonable maintenance orders; it also highlights a broader systemic failure within South Africa’s justice system. The system does not account for the economic realities that many fathers face and often weaponizes maintenance to punish them rather than ensure the best interests of the children. Maintenance orders, while crucial, need to be fair and realistic to avoid plunging fathers into financial hardship.

It is clear that fathers should start bringing cases against lawyers, maintenance officers, and courts for financial abuse under the Domestic Violence Act. The Act, although historically focused on physical and emotional abuse, recognizes that financial manipulation is also a significant form of abuse. By pursuing legal action, fathers can challenge the system and bring attention to the coercive and abusive practices they are subjected to during maintenance negotiations. It is time to recognize that fathers are being systematically financially abused and that this abuse must be addressed for the well-being of both fathers and their children.

To expand on the factors that detrimentally affect fathers in South Africa from paying maintenance and maintaining their children financially, it is necessary to examine the socio-political, economic, legal, and educational frameworks that create these challenges. Below are ten expanded points that delve into these critical factors, supported by scientific and statistical research. I will also incorporate a detailed analysis of the South African economy’s deterioration and its impact on fathers’ ability to meet financial obligations.

1. Legacy of Apartheid and Migrant Labor

The apartheid-era policies of labor migration led to a fragmented family structure in South Africa. Under the migrant labor system, many fathers were forced to leave their homes to work in mines and cities, often for extended periods. This legacy persists today, with many men working far from their families to earn an income. As a result, fathers are often physically absent, which not only strains relationships but also contributes to financial instability due to the high cost of maintaining two households.

  • Reference: South African Institute of Race Relations. (2018). “The Impact of the Migrant Labor System on Family Structure in South Africa.”
    URL: SAIRR Report

2. Unemployment and Economic Instability

South Africa’s unemployment rate has reached a staggering 32.6% in 2024, (it is estimated that an additional 30% of people have given up looking for work further exacerbating the the financial ability of fathers to pay) severely impacting fathers’ ability to pay child maintenance. Unemployment disproportionately affects men in industries such as mining, construction, and manufacturing, where jobs are becoming scarce due to economic contraction. High unemployment leads to widespread poverty, which exacerbates fathers’ struggles to meet maintenance obligations.

3. Financial Burden of Maintenance Payments

Child maintenance obligations place a significant financial burden on fathers, especially those earning low wages. The South African Law Reform Commission reports that a large percentage of fathers default on child maintenance, not due to negligence but because of insufficient income to meet the legal obligations. This often leads to legal penalties, further exacerbating financial instability.

  • Reference: South African Law Reform Commission. (2015). “Maintenance Obligations in South Africa.”
    URL: SALRC Report

4. Inequality in Access to Economic Resources

Fathers from marginalized communities, particularly Black South African men, face significant economic barriers. These fathers are less likely to have stable jobs and access to financial resources, which limits their ability to provide for their children. The structural inequalities stemming from South Africa’s apartheid legacy continue to disproportionately affect these fathers.

  • Reference: Statistics South Africa. (2019). “Living Conditions Survey: Economic Inequalities in South Africa.”
    URL: StatsSA Inequality Report

5. Gender Roles and Societal Expectations

South Africa’s cultural norms emphasize the role of men as financial providers rather than emotional caregivers. This societal pressure forces many fathers to prioritize financial contributions over spending time with their children. When these fathers fail to meet financial expectations due to unemployment or economic hardship, they are stigmatized and labeled as irresponsible, which can discourage their involvement in their children’s lives.

  • Reference: Richter, L., et al. (2012). “Fathers and Their Roles in Child Development in South Africa.”
    URL: Richter Study

6. Legal System Failures

South Africa’s legal system is notoriously slow and inefficient when it comes to resolving family disputes. Fathers often wait years—sometimes up to 8 years—to gain inadequate or marginal contact with their children. During this period, fathers continue to be financially drained by prolonged legal battles. The court system prioritizes litigation over alternative dispute resolution mechanisms like mediation, which could expedite the process and lessen the financial burden on fathers.

  • Reference: South African Law Reform Commission. (2019). “Family Law and the Delays in Resolving Custody Disputes.”
    URL: SALRC Report

7. Corruption and Economic Decline

The South African economy has been severely affected by corruption, nepotism, and poor governance. Since 1994, the country has experienced economic decline due to failed socialist and communist policies. As a result, fathers struggle to find and maintain stable employment, making it difficult for them to comply with child maintenance obligations. South Africa’s GDP growth has stagnated, and poverty levels continue to rise, further exacerbating financial difficulties.

  • Reference: World Bank. (2024). “South Africa Economic Update: Corruption and Its Impact on Economic Growth.”
    URL: World Bank Report

8. Stigma Against Non-Custodial Fathers

Fathers who are not the primary custodians of their children are often labeled as disengaged or deadbeat. This societal stigma discourages fathers from remaining involved in their children’s lives, both financially and emotionally. Moreover, these fathers face discrimination in family courts, where mothers are more likely to be awarded custody, leaving fathers with the sole obligation of paying maintenance without the benefit of co-parenting.

  • Reference: Morrell, R., et al. (2012). “Fathers in South African Society: Marginalization of Non-Custodial Fathers.”
    URL: Morrell Study

9. Lack of Parenting Programs

South Africa offers very few programs aimed at educating fathers about their legal responsibilities and the importance of active involvement in their children’s lives. Without adequate support, many fathers do not fully understand their maintenance obligations or the legal consequences of defaulting. This lack of education also contributes to the emotional detachment between fathers and their children.

  • Reference: Richter, L., & Morrell, R. (2010). “Parenting Programs for Fathers in South Africa.”
    URL: Richter & Morrell Report

10. Educational Inequalities

Educational disparities in South Africa impact fathers’ ability to support their children academically and financially. Fathers from disadvantaged backgrounds are often under-educated and unemployed, which hinders their ability to meet their children’s financial needs. The lack of quality education further perpetuates a cycle of poverty and unemployment, contributing to the father’s inability to pay maintenance.

  • Reference: Department of Basic Education. (2021). “Education and Its Impact on Economic Inequality in South Africa.”
    URL: DBE Report

Conclusion: Addressing the Challenges Faced by Fathers in Paying Maintenance

The issue of child maintenance in South Africa is a multifaceted problem that requires urgent attention. Fathers are disproportionately affected by economic instability, high unemployment rates, and deeply entrenched social inequalities that limit their ability to meet child maintenance requirements. The country’s unemployment rate alone has left millions of men without steady incomes, making it increasingly difficult for them to maintain regular financial contributions to their children’s upbringing (Statistics South Africa, 2024). Moreover, poverty and unequal access to economic resources continue to disproportionately affect Black fathers, perpetuating the cycle of financial instability and legal troubles.

The legal system in South Africa also adds to the problem, as it is often slow and ineffective in addressing fathers’ rights and obligations. Many men spend years navigating a legal maze just to establish contact with their children or to negotiate maintenance payments that reflect their actual financial situations. Unfortunately, the legal system, as it currently stands, fails to address the growing financial and emotional strain that fathers endure. The Department of Social Development’s Children’s Amendment Bill [B18-2020] aimed to address some of these legal and financial challenges, but as of now, failed to make the changes so desperately needed and many gaps remain, leaving fathers vulnerable to both legal consequences and public stigmatization.

Socially, fathers in South Africa are also hindered by cultural norms that view men primarily as financial providers. This cultural expectation marginalizes fathers, especially those struggling with unemployment or financial hardship, leading to emotional detachment from their children. When fathers are unable to fulfill their role as breadwinners, society often views them as failures, further driving their alienation from the family unit. Moreover, societal stigma surrounding non-custodial fathers compounds their difficulties, as they are often labeled as disengaged or irresponsible, regardless of the financial and emotional challenges they face.

The deteriorating state of education in South Africa adds another layer of complexity to the issue. Fathers who have not received adequate education may lack the skills needed to secure stable employment, further limiting their ability to contribute financially to their children’s lives. The failure of the educational system to equip children and parents alike with real-world skills has long-term consequences, exacerbating financial instability in families and communities.

In conclusion, addressing the challenges faced by fathers in paying child maintenance in South Africa requires a multi-pronged approach. Economic reform, legal support, and cultural shifts are necessary to ensure that fathers are not only held accountable for their financial responsibilities but also supported in maintaining meaningful relationships with their children. The current system places too much emphasis on financial provision without considering the broader social, economic, and emotional contexts in which fathers are operating. Only by addressing these interconnected issues can South Africa begin to create a more equitable and supportive environment for fathers and their children.

References

  1. Statistics South Africa. “Quarterly Labour Force Survey – Q1:2024.” Statistics South Africa, 2024, www.statssa.gov.za.
  2. South African Institute of Race Relations. “Family Structure and Its Impact on Children.” SAIRR, 2018, irr.org.za.
  3. South African Law Reform Commission. “Review of Child Maintenance Laws.” SALRC, 2015, salawreform.justice.gov.za.
  4. Richter, L., et al. “Fathers in South Africa: Roles, Responsibilities, and Involvement.” Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), 2012, hsrc.ac.za.
  5. Morrell, R., Jewkes, R., and Lindegger, G. “Hegemonic Masculinity and the Reinvention of Fatherhood.” Men and Masculinities, vol. 15, no. 1, 2012, pp. 53-70.
  6. Derebus. (2021). Understanding Economic Abuse from a Domestic Violence Perspective. Derebus.org.za.
  7. DivorceLaws.co.za. (n.d.). What is Economic Abuse? DivorceLaws.co.za.
  8. Domestic Violence Amendment Act 14 of 2021. Republic of South Africa.South African Government Website:
    https://www.gov.za/documents/domestic-violence-amendment-act-14-2021-5-oct-2021

Contact Information for The Official Fathers 4 Justice South Africa:

For any Queries, feel free to reach out via email or WhatsApp

#fathersrights #equalrights #childrensrights #familylaw #divorce #parentingrights #constitution #familycourt #custody # Fathersparentalrightsandresponsibilities #Fathershelpline #whatrightsdoesafatherhave #childcustody #divorce #law #genderbias #fathersrights #mothers #children #parentingrights #discrimination #familycourt #familylaw #legalreform #socialjustice #equalrights #jointcustody #endbias #reformnow #5050custody #unitethefamily #allfamiliesmatter #fatherlessness #childrensrights #saveoursons #ParentalRights #CustodyRights #CoParenting #LegalAdvice #FamilyLaw #ChildCustody #FatherhoodRights #FalseAccusations #MaintenanceDisputes #LegalFAQs#FamilyLaw #MediationAdvocacy #Fathers4Justice #ParentingPlan #LegalReform #DivorceResolution #CustodyRights #EfficientMediation #LegalAccountability #Curatorpersonae #familyadvocatejohannesburg #childcustody #advematheofjusticesouthafrica #Curatorbonis #curatoradlitem #Visitation #Fathersrights #Fathersresponsibilities #divorce #Guardianship #Contact #Care #Custody #Childcustody #Custodyofthechild #childmaintenance #guardianadlitem #curatoradlitem #Voiceofthechild #divorcemediationsouthafrica #fathersrights #fathersrightsinsouthafrica #howdivorceaffectschildren #howtogetaletterofguardianship #guardianship #divorcemediation #divorcemediationnearme #Maintenance #Maintenanceissues #Maintenanceproblems #familylaw #familycourtsouthafrica #fathers4justice #familylawsouthafrica #parentsrights #unmarriedfathersrightsinsouthafrica #visitationrightsforfathersinsouthafrica #whendoesafatherloseparentalrightssouthafrica #legalguardianshipdocument #familylawyersnearme #custodyofchildtofather #unmarriedfathersrights #parentingplan #parentingplanexample #parentingplanssouthafrica #Parentalalienation #Parentalalienationsyndrome #PAS #DSM5

Tagged , , , , , , , ,