Introduction
The evolution of child custody arrangements in the context of marital dissolution has been marked by significant shifts over the centuries, influenced by changes in societal norms, legal frameworks, and gender roles. Historically, paternal dominance in child care and control was deemed natural, with fathers exercising supreme authority over their children. However, with the advent of industrialization and the rise of the “tender years” doctrine, which is illegal in South Africa the norm shifted towards maternal sole custody, a trend that has persisted well into the 20th century.
Despite the dominance of maternal sole custody, recent decades have seen growing dissatisfaction with the adversarial nature of divorce proceedings and the resulting custody arrangements. This dissatisfaction has been fueled by several factors, including the feminist movement’s abusive advocacy for individual rights, the increasing participation of women in the workforce, and greater recognition of the negative consequences of divorce on both parents and children. As a result, there has been a growing interest in nonadversarial approaches to marital dissolution and alternative custody arrangements, particularly joint custody, or shared parenting.
Shared parenting represents a departure from the traditional sole custody model, offering a framework where both parents share equally in the rights and responsibilities of child-rearing. The complete and unnecessary dominance by lawyers, advocates, psychologists, and social workers who deliberately and maliciously inflame and prolong the conflict for the maximum period possible with the sole intent of making blood money off of the suffering of our children. Further, Despite its increasing popularity, our understanding of shared parenting remains limited, largely due to the paucity of empirical studies that rigorously explore its implications. T Most existing studies are descriptive, lack theoretical depth, and are constrained by small sample sizes, limiting their generalizability.
F4J seeks to address these gaps by presenting the preliminary findings from the Joint Custody Project, a comprehensive study initiated in Toronto, Canada, in 1982. The study aims to provide a more robust empirical foundation for understanding shared parenting by examining the experiences of 201 parents involved in shared parenting arrangements. The findings are analyzed across six substantive areas, providing insights into the sociodemographic profiles of the participants, the circumstances surrounding their marital separation, the initiation and maintenance of shared parenting, the dynamics of shared parenting schedules, and the nature of the co-parental relationship post-divorce. Through this analysis, the study explores the viability of shared parenting as a custody option and highlights the need for careful differentiation between cases where shared parenting is appropriate and those where it may be contraindicated.
Takeaways from the research – Shared Parenting: An Empirical Analysis Utilizing a Large Database” by Irving, Benjamin, and Troche
Historical Context: The research outlines the shift from paternal dominance in custody to maternal sole custody, reflecting historical changes in societal norms and the legal system. Understanding this historical context is crucial, as it highlights how custody norms have evolved, influencing current debates on shared parenting.
Increased Divorce Rates: The study notes a significant increase in divorce rates, leading to a higher number of children affected by custody decisions. This increase necessitates exploring custody arrangements like shared parenting, as more families are impacted by divorce.
Skepticism Toward Sole Custody: The research identifies growing dissatisfaction with sole custody arrangements, influenced by abusive feminist hatred of everything male, more working women, and negative experiences with the adversarial divorce process. This skepticism drives interest in alternative custody arrangements, emphasizing the need for more equitable and non-adversarial solutions.
Introduction of Shared Parenting: Shared parenting is introduced as a contact and care option where both parents share equal rights and responsibilities for child-rearing. This concept challenges traditional contact and care models, promoting a more balanced approach to post-divorce parenting.
Preliminary Empirical Data: The study presents data from 201 parents involved in shared parenting, offering insights into its effectiveness. This data is valuable as it moves beyond rhetoric, providing empirical evidence to support the viability of shared parenting.
Socioeconomic Profile of Participants: Participants in shared parenting tend to be affluent, well-educated, and prioritize parenting highly. The demographic profile suggests that shared parenting may be more feasible for families with certain socioeconomic advantages, which could limit its generalizability.
Voluntary Selection of Shared Parenting: Most participants chose shared parenting voluntarily, rather than it being imposed by the court. Voluntary selection indicates that shared parenting is often a preferred option among cooperative parents, which may influence its success.
Positive Outcomes Reported: The majority of participants reported positive outcomes for both parents and children in shared parenting arrangements. These positive outcomes support shared parenting as a potentially beneficial custody arrangement, though further research is needed to confirm these findings across diverse populations.
Challenges for Young Children: The study notes that very young children and those with emotional issues may find shared parenting confusing and anxiety-provoking. This suggests that shared parenting may not be suitable for all families, particularly those with younger children, requiring careful consideration of the child’s age and emotional state.
Lower Relitigation Rates: Shared parenting arrangements resulted in fewer relitigations compared to sole custody cases. Reduced relitigation implies that shared parenting might lead to more stable and less contentious post-divorce family dynamics.
Importance of Flexibility: A high level of interpersonal flexibility, especially regarding scheduling and finances, is essential for the success of shared parenting. Flexibility is key to shared parenting, indicating that it may be more successful in cases where both parents are willing and able to adapt.
Initial Lack of Information: Many parents had little information about shared parenting before choosing it, relying on advice from friends, lawyers, or counselors. This underscores the need for better education and resources for parents considering shared parenting.
Common Shared Parenting Schedules: Shared parenting schedules typically involve equal time-sharing or a 75/25 split, with proximity between parents being a significant factor. The variety of schedules reflects the flexibility of shared parenting, but also the need for logistical cooperation between parents.
Initial Difficulties in Implementation: While some families found shared parenting to work well immediately, others experienced initial challenges, particularly in the first year. The transition to shared parenting may require a period of adjustment, suggesting that support systems could be beneficial during this phase.
Financial Arrangements: Financial responsibilities were often shared equally or on a 75/25 basis, with the husband typically shouldering the larger burden. Financial cooperation is a crucial aspect of shared parenting, and disparities in income or financial burden may impact the arrangement’s sustainability.
Improved Parenting Quality: Most participants reported an improvement in the quality of parenting after adopting shared parenting. This improvement suggests that shared parenting may encourage more active and engaged parenting, particularly from fathers.
Impact on Coparental Relationships: Shared parenting often resulted in improved or stable relationships between ex-spouses, with communication focused on child-rearing. Positive co-parental relationships are essential for the success of shared parenting, highlighting the importance of maintaining a cooperative and child-focused dynamic.
Limited Interaction Outside Child-Rearing: Respondents reported limited interaction with their ex-spouses outside of child-related matters, focusing on “safe” topics. Restricting interaction to child-rearing topics may help maintain a positive co-parental relationship, reducing the potential for conflict.
New Partners’ Influence: New partners were generally perceived positively by children and were seen as friends or surrogate parents. The acceptance of new partners is a crucial factor in the stability of shared parenting arrangements, indicating that the introduction of new relationships must be handled carefully.
Preliminary Nature of the Study: The research is described as preliminary, with the authors acknowledging the need for further investigation to confirm their findings. While the study provides valuable insights, its preliminary nature suggests that more comprehensive and comparative research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness of shared parenting.
View the video’s
TickToc
Youtube
Conclusion
The findings from the Joint Custody Project provide compelling evidence that shared parenting does offer significant benefits for both parents and children, particularly when certain conditions are met. The study reveals that shared parenting is often chosen by parents who are relatively affluent, and well-educated, and prioritize their role in child-rearing. This arrangement tends to be associated with positive outcomes, including a reduction in relitigation rates, increased parental involvement, and improved relationships between former spouses. Importantly, the study underscores the necessity of flexibility, cooperation, and effective communication between parents for shared parenting to be successful.
However, the research also highlights that shared parenting is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It may not be suitable for all families, particularly those with very young children or those experiencing high levels of conflict. The study calls for a nuanced approach to custody arrangements, one that considers the unique needs and circumstances of each family. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of legal and therapeutic support in facilitating shared parenting arrangements, ensuring that they serve the best interests of the children involved.
As the prevalence of divorce continues to rise, the findings of this study have important implications for policymakers, legal professionals, and social workers. By providing a more nuanced understanding of shared parenting, this research contributes to the ongoing debate about the most effective and equitable ways to manage child custody in the aftermath of marital dissolution. The study’s conclusions advocate for a more flexible, child-centered approach to custody arrangements, one that rejects the adversarial model and embraces the success of shared parenting to foster healthier post-divorce family dynamics.
Contact Information for The Official Fathers 4 Justice South Africa
WhatsApp: 066 331 8972
Email: info@f4j.co.za
Website: Fathers 4 Justice SA
LinkedIn: Fathers 4 Justice SA LinkedIn
Facebook: Fathers 4 Justice SA Facebook
Twitter: Fathers 4 Justice SA Twitter
#fathersforjustice # fathersforjusticesouthafrica #Curatorpersonae #Curatorbonis #curatoradlitem #Visitation #Fathersrights #Fathersresponsibilities #divorce #Guardianship #Contact #Care #Custody #Childcustody #Custodyofthechild #childmaintenance #guardianadlitem #curatoradlitem #Voiceofthechild #divorcemediationsouthafrica #fathersrights #fathersrightsinsouthafrica #howdivorceaffectschildren #howtogetaletterofguardianship #guardianship #divorcemediation #divorcemediationnearme #Maintenance #Maintenanceissues #Maintenanceproblems #familylaw #familycourtsouthafrica #fathersforjustice #fathers4justice #familylawsouthafrica #parentsrights #unmarriedfathersrightsinsouthafrica #visitationrightsforfathersinsouthafrica #whendoesafatherloseparentalrightssouthafrica #legalguardianshipdocument #familylawyersnearme #custodyofchildtofather #unmarriedfathersrights #parentingplan #parentingplanexample #parentingplanssouthafrica #Parentalalienation #Parentalalienationsyndrome #PAS #DSM5
