The relationship between a father and his child is a cornerstone of healthy child development, providing emotional stability, guidance, and a sense of security. The father’s relationship between father and child does not supersede or replace that of the relationship between the mother and child. Both mother’s and father’s roles in raising a child are uniquely vital. Anyone impending on the right of the child to have an equal unrestricted relationship with both of its parents at all times is a child abuser.
The feminist woke, and misandrist elements within our society, including psychologists, lawyers, and the gynocentric legal system, are complicit in the emotional and psychological harm inflicted on children by perpetuating biases that alienate fathers.
Fathers play an irreplaceable role in shaping their children’s lives, influencing everything from self-esteem to social competence. However, in the wake of a divorce or separation, this critical bond is severely tested, especially when the mother harbors negative feelings toward the father. It’s vital to recognize that, regardless of the personal dynamics between parents, a child’s right to a meaningful relationship with both parents must be protected. When mothers obstruct or undermine a father’s involvement, it has a direct long-lasting, detrimental effect on the child’s well-being. Understanding the ways in which a mother’s actions can impact a father’s relationship with his child is essential in ensuring that both parents continue to play an active and supportive role in their child’s life, free from the influence of unresolved conflicts.
Mothers deliberately and negatively impact or obliterate a father’s ongoing relationship with their child after a divorce or separation:
Threatening Consequences: Mothers threaten negative consequences (like withholding affection or support) if the child expresses a desire to see the father.
Parental Alienation: Mothers engage in behaviors that deliberately alienate the child from the father, such as bad-mouthing the father or blaming him for the family’s breakup.
Restricting Access: Mothers limit or deny visitation rights, making it difficult for the father to maintain regular contact with the child.
Legal Manipulation: By exploiting legal systems, mothers maliciously through the direct instruction of their lawyers, file false accusations, and pursue aggressive legal actions to restrict the father’s access to the child.
Undermining Authority: Mothers undermine the father’s authority by questioning his decisions in front of the child, weakening his role as a parent.
Emotional Manipulation: Mothers use guilt or fear to influence the child’s feelings toward the father, painting him as the villain.
Encouraging Rejection: Mothers encourage or subtly reward the child for rejecting or avoiding the father.
Hiding Communication: Mothers intercept or hide messages, letters, or gifts from the father to the child, creating a communication gap.
Creating False Narratives: Mothers create false stories or exaggerate incidents to convince the child that the father is dangerous, unloving, or untrustworthy.
Manipulating Schedules: Mothers may frequently change or cancel visitation schedules, making it difficult for the father to plan time with the child.
Influencing Child’s Decisions: By constantly criticizing or demeaning the father, mothers influence the child to choose not to spend time with him.
Refusing Co-Parenting Cooperation: Mothers who refuse to co-parent or communicate effectively with the father deliberately create unnecessary conflicts and distance between the father and the child.
Withholding Information: Mothers withhold important information about the child’s life, such as school events or medical appointments, excluding the father from being involved.
Limiting Financial Resources: By demanding excessive child support or financial contributions, mothers put undue financial pressure on the father, limiting his ability to provide for the child in other ways.
This is financial abuse under the Domestic Violence Act
Manipulating the Child’s Emotions: Mothers play on the child’s emotions, making them feel guilty for wanting to spend time with the father.
Encouraging Dependency: By fostering excessive dependency on the mother, the child feels less inclined to build a strong relationship with the father.
Involving New Partners: Introducing a new partner and encouraging the child to see him as a “new father” can diminish the biological father’s role and importance.
Creating Hostile Environments: Mothers create a hostile environment during visitations, making the child feel uncomfortable or unsafe with the father.
Exaggerating Father’s Flaws: By consistently pointing out the father’s flaws, mothers convince the child that the father is not worth having a relationship with.
Exposing the Child to Adult Conflicts: Mothers who involve children in adult disputes, especially regarding divorce, cause the child to take sides, often against the father.
Fathers 4 Justice South Africa (F4J SA) acknowledges that the issues surrounding parental rights and responsibilities are complex, with many contributing factors. However, the narrative that blames fathers for all family law issues, as often portrayed by feminist, communist, and woke ideologies, is misleading and unproductive. While we recognize that there are problematic fathers, we must also address the reality that some mothers deliberately deny fathers their rightful contact with their children. This is not a one-way street, and it is essential to confront these issues head-on if we are to make meaningful progress.
It is crucial to understand that mothers do not have superior rights to their children. There is no law in South Africa that grants mothers greater rights than fathers, nor should there be. The Constitution guarantees equality before the law, and this principle must be upheld in all matters related to family law.
Fathers 4 Justice is not merely asking for changes to the Children’s Act and the Divorce Act—we are demanding them. The consistent finger-pointing at fathers as the source of all problems in family law is intolerable, and we will no longer stand for it. The following changes must be implemented as a matter of extreme urgency:
Fathers 4 Justice South Africa (F4J SA) is calling for urgent reforms to the Children’s Act to address the systemic discrimination and exploitation faced by fathers. The organization highlights that Sections 19, 20, and 21 of the Act are being manipulated by all lawyers, advocates, psychologists, and social welfare workers, leading to severe emotional, financial, and psychological harm to fathers and their children. These actions directly undermine fathers’ rights and responsibilities, inflicting significant trauma on children in the process.
The Centre for Gender Equality and the Constitutional Court have both recognized the discriminatory nature of certain provisions within the Children’s Act. The Constitutional Court’s ruling on 29 June 2023 declared that Section 40 of the Children’s Act and Section 4 of the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act 24 of 1987 are unconstitutional. These sections were found to unfairly discriminate between children of married and never-married parents, particularly in terms of their best interests being investigated by the Office of the Family Advocate.
In light of these developments, F4J SA demands the following amendments and actions:
Unified Family Court System: The current complex and costly court system should be streamlined into a single entity, similar to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). This system would handle all family-related matters more efficiently and fairly.
Automatic Equal Rights for Both Parents: A child must have the immediate right to joint, equal, shared, daily contact, care, guardianship, and maintenance from both biological parents from birth, unless there is evidence of violence, abuse, or neglect.
Cultural and Legal Parity: Marital status, culture, religion, or tradition should not influence a child’s right to equal care and contact with both parents. The practice of paying Isondolo, a cultural “fine” in some communities, should not be a legal requirement for fathers to gain parental rights, as this would be unconstitutional.
Protection Against Parental Alienation: Parental Alienation Syndrome should be criminalized and integrated into the Domestic Violence Act. Legal representatives who make false allegations to deny contact with a parent must face severe consequences, with no discretion allowed for leniency.
Mandatory Mediation and Arbitration: Mediation in parental plans should be automatic and completed within 90 days of parental separation. If mediation fails, arbitration should be the next step, ensuring a 50/50 split in care, contact, guardianship, and maintenance.
Most recent Correspondence with the Department of Social Development to date.
Response from the Chair Ms Masango to F4J SA dated the 25th of July 2024
Response by F4J SA to Ms Masango and the Department of Social Development Dated 30th July 2024
Conclusion
F4J demands the urgent need for balanced and fair treatment in post-divorce parenting, advocating for reforms that protect the rights of both parents. It stresses that mothers who engage in alienating behaviors against fathers not only harm the father-child relationship but also contravene the principles of equality enshrined in the South African Constitution. Fathers 4 Justice calls for immediate legislative changes to address these biases, ensuring that children maintain healthy relationships with both parents, ultimately fostering their emotional and psychological well-being.
#fathersforjustice # fathersforjusticesouthafrica #Curatorpersonae #Curatorbonis #curatoradlitem #Visitation #Fathersrights #Fathersresponsibilities #divorce #Guardianship #Contact #Care #Custody #Childcustody #Custodyofthechild #childmaintenance #guardianadlitem #curatoradlitem #Voiceofthechild #divorcemediationsouthafrica #fathersrights #fathersrightsinsouthafrica #howdivorceaffectschildren #howtogetaletterofguardianship #guardianship #divorcemediation #divorcemediationnearme #Maintenance #Maintenanceissues #Maintenanceproblems #familylaw #familycourtsouthafrica #fathersforjustice #fathers4justice #familylawsouthafrica #parentsrights #unmarriedfathersrightsinsouthafrica #visitationrightsforfathersinsouthafrica #whendoesafatherloseparentalrightssouthafrica #legalguardianshipdocument #familylawyersnearme #custodyofchildtofather #unmarriedfathersrights #parentingplan #parentingplanexample #parentingplanssouthafrica #Parentalalienation #Parentalalienationsyndrome #PAS #DSM5